Third Jensen Huang affair reported by December 31?

DataSnack has a model of this question but not yet enough data to forecast it; the market's number (Polymarket) is 100%. It has no graded forecasts yet; the first is graded on 20 Nov 2026.

DataSnack's read

At 100%, the market is testing the resolution rules, not the rumor

The affair story has already cost Huang the CEO and board roles, a governance shock for NVIDIA. The model's case rests on the 100% starting point, with a light decay to 99% in case a report is not seen as qualifying.

The numbers

How the model works

The market sits at about 100%, so the simplest honest model is that it stays there. A light hazard decay allows for the chance that the report is not seen as qualifying.

Sources

The record

It has no graded forecasts yet; the first is graded on 20 Nov 2026.

Waiting for their day:

Questions

What is DataSnack's forecast? There isn't one yet: the model doesn't have enough data.

What is the market's number? The market's number (Polymarket) is 100%.

How does the model work? It is an explicit equation fitted on data, with every link and source listed above. DataSnack's agents propose changes every night, and a replay against real data decides what is kept.

How accurate has it been? It has no graded forecasts yet; the first is graded on 20 Nov 2026. DataSnack's overall record is at https://datasnack.ai/accuracy.

Can I download the model? Readers who cover this model can export it as an Excel workbook with working formulas from its page. A free example workbook: https://datasnack.ai/site/labs/datasnack-tariff-mortgage-lab.xlsx.

Can I pull its numbers into a spreadsheet? Its feed is at https://datasnack.ai/feed/m/ch:66eb8a51123f.csv, with each forecast's error and standing still's beside it.


Canonical: https://datasnack.ai/m/ch:66eb8a51123f · DataSnack forecasts are analysis, not investment advice.